Pakistan’s Ticking Time Bomb

Posted by: Keith Kloor

Looks like we got ourselves a long-term situation in Pakistan. As Tod Preston points out,

among the many challenges confronting the nation—including a growing Taliban insurgency—one significant problem remains largely undiscussed: its rapidly expanding population.

In his post at The New Security Beat, Preston notes that

Pakistan’s population nearly quadrupled from 50 million in 1960 to 180 million todayIt’s expected to add another 66 million people—nearly the entire population of Iran—in the next 15 years.

What do these numbers add up to? Well, because “public schools have become increasingly overcrowded,” Preston writes, “more parents have turned to madrasas in an attempt to educate their children–or at least their sons. It’s no secret that some of Pakistan’s madrases have ties to radical religious and terrorist-affiliated organizations.”

What does this portend? Preston paints the obvious picture:

It seems likely that enrollments in madrasas will swell, and more children will face a future with no schooling whatsoever. Clearly, this is not a recipe for a more peaceful and stable Pakistan.

Clearly, national security experts should be talking more about family planning.

Sphere: Related Content


Category: Pakistan, extremism, family planning, overpopulation

Who Knew?

Posted by: Keith Kloor

“A Kellogg’s Nutri-Grain bar has ingredients from nine countries in it.”

So much for that bandwagon I’ve been meaning to get on.

Sphere: Related Content


Category: globalization

Only a Matter of Time?

Posted by: Keith Kloor

The N.Y. Times carried this front-page headline (and sub-hed) today:

Containing Flu Is Not Feasible, Specialists Say
They Urge a Strategy of Mitigating Effects

How long before we see an identical hed and sub-hed, with just one word change:

Containing Flu Climate Change is Not Feasible, Specialists say

I’m not suggesting, just wondering…

Sphere: Related Content


Category: climate change, swine flu

Dumb and Dumber at Rommland

Posted by: Keith Kloor

So the Indispensable One is telling his choir to ignore a prestigious, internationally respected journal that has just devoted much of its current issue to climate change, which contains articles by these guys.

Predictably, Rommians are grateful for the Indispensable One’s directive:

Great post. Saved me a couple hours. You are the best.

Hey, you dopey sheep, how about reading the articles in Nature for yourselves and making up your own minds?

Sphere: Related Content


Category: Joe Romm, climate change

The Ruthless Link Economy

Posted by: Keith Kloor

I haven’t been able to shake this days-old post by Jeff Jarvis, journalism provocateur, bar none. I suspect he’s right about the only metric that counts in the new digital world. Here’s the essential graph:

Every minute of a journalist’s time will need to go to adding unique value to the news ecosystem: reporting, curating, organizing. This efficiency is necessitated by the reduction of resources. But it is also a product of the link and search economy: The only way to stand out is to add unique value and quality. My advice in the past has been: If you can’t imagine why someone would link to what you’re doing, you probably shouldn’t be doing it. And: Do what you do best and link to the rest. The link economy is ruthless in judging value.

Do what you do best and link to the rest.

Every journalist/blogger should chew on that line. I know I am and its giving me fits.

Sphere: Related Content


Category: Journalism, new media

When Viral Meets Viral

Posted by: Keith Kloor

After SARS hysteria swept through the media in 2003, David Rothkopf, writing in The Washington Post, called it an “information epidemic”–or “infodemic.”

He defined “infodemic” as thus:

A few facts, mixed with fear, speculation and rumor, amplified and relayed swiftly worldwide by modern information technologies, have affected national and international economies, politics and even security in ways that are utterly disproportionate with the root realities. It is a phenomenon we have seen with greater frequency in recent years — not only in our reaction to SARS, for example, but also in our response to terrorism and even to relatively minor occurrences such as shark sightings.

Now, writing in his blog for Foreign Policy magazine, Rothkopf sizes up the latest “infodemic” spawned by the Swine Flu outbreak.  “It is critical,” he writes, “that the media offer information about symptoms, precautions, and the spread of potential epidemics.” That’s his set-up pitch. Then he throws this slider:

But whereas health officials practice how to manage these crises, not only do the vast majority of media never think such matters through, newer “viral” media are all emotion all the time.

Rothkopf seems to be taking aim at two things here: the breathless and endless cable tv news covarge, and the fast mutating variant of a story being tweeted, digged and stumbled upon.

Is there any way around this? Probably not. But he thinks such media contagion can be better managed.

Sphere: Related Content


Category: SARS, infodemic, media, swine flu

The Post-Darwinian Media Landscape

Posted by: Keith Kloor

What might a “taxonomy of new-media animals” look like after the great Darwinian shake out? Check out this forecast by Matt Pressman at Vanity Fair’s Politics & Power blog.

No surprise: he gives the “Inky mammoth” species poor chances of survival.

Sphere: Related Content


Category: Journalism, new media

Anthroids

Posted by: Keith Kloor

I can’t wait to hear what the real anthros over at Savage Minds have to say about the Pentagon’s idea to replicate them.

Sphere: Related Content


Category: Anthropology, pentagon

Media Overkill?

Posted by: Keith Kloor

Howie Kurtz at The Washington Post seems to think so.


Category: media, swine flu

Clinton’s Formula for Curbing Climate Change

Posted by: Keith Kloor

Lost amid swine flu frenzy is the import of yesterday’s speech by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on climate change and foreign policy.

But the ever reliable Keith Johnson at Environmental Capital caught it:

What was really interesting was Ms. Clinton’s argument about the economics of tackling climate change. Basically, she said that curbing greenhouse-gas emissions is more than just compatible with economic growth—it is a necessary condition for sustained growth, above all for the developing world.

Sphere: Related Content


Category: climate change, economic growth