<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Art of Climate Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collide-a-scape.com/2010/01/19/the-art-of-climate-communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collide-a-scape.com/2010/01/19/the-art-of-climate-communication/</link>
	<description>where nature and culture meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tobis</title>
		<link>http://www.collide-a-scape.com/2010/01/19/the-art-of-climate-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tobis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collide-a-scape.com/?p=2251#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>I am not sure RP Jr has the right taxonomy. But he is asking the right question. Things are indeed  harder when roles aren&#039;t well-defined.

(I note that RP Jr has no role for journalism in his model. Interesting.)

More crucially to his argument, RP Jr here makes no reference to the influence of public funding agencies, which consistently blur the sorts of boundaries RP Jr tries to set up. As a scientist, your job description, in the end, is to get grants and fulfill them. You also have an ethical requirement that, to the extent your results have implications in public discourse, to ensure that the public understanding is as close to substantially correct as you can manage. Neither of these forces currently make any effort to align with RP Jr&#039;s taxonomy.

A lot of how people expect scientists to behave is at odds with their institutional constraints. RP Jr presumably understands this, so I hope that in the book he suggests appropriate institutional change to support his ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure RP Jr has the right taxonomy. But he is asking the right question. Things are indeed  harder when roles aren&#8217;t well-defined.</p>
<p>(I note that RP Jr has no role for journalism in his model. Interesting.)</p>
<p>More crucially to his argument, RP Jr here makes no reference to the influence of public funding agencies, which consistently blur the sorts of boundaries RP Jr tries to set up. As a scientist, your job description, in the end, is to get grants and fulfill them. You also have an ethical requirement that, to the extent your results have implications in public discourse, to ensure that the public understanding is as close to substantially correct as you can manage. Neither of these forces currently make any effort to align with RP Jr&#8217;s taxonomy.</p>
<p>A lot of how people expect scientists to behave is at odds with their institutional constraints. RP Jr presumably understands this, so I hope that in the book he suggests appropriate institutional change to support his ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.collide-a-scape.com/2010/01/19/the-art-of-climate-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collide-a-scape.com/?p=2251#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>&quot;I realize that this fact is hard for climate advocates to wrap their own minds around.&quot;  *sigh*  Yeah, climate advocates are idiots who need to be set straight by journalists.  You betcha, Keith.

&quot;But they are often asked to paint a future picture of an increasing CO2 load.&quot;  Which they do, but then journalists fail to cover it for the most part.  By all means let&#039;s blame the scientists for that, though.  After all, if we can&#039;t scapegoat them ot the environmentalists, we&#039;d have to, you know, consider the institutional failings of journalism. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I realize that this fact is hard for climate advocates to wrap their own minds around.&#8221;  *sigh*  Yeah, climate advocates are idiots who need to be set straight by journalists.  You betcha, Keith.</p>
<p>&#8220;But they are often asked to paint a future picture of an increasing CO2 load.&#8221;  Which they do, but then journalists fail to cover it for the most part.  By all means let&#8217;s blame the scientists for that, though.  After all, if we can&#8217;t scapegoat them ot the environmentalists, we&#8217;d have to, you know, consider the institutional failings of journalism. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Kloor</title>
		<link>http://www.collide-a-scape.com/2010/01/19/the-art-of-climate-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Kloor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collide-a-scape.com/?p=2251#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>No, I don&#039;t think scientists will become art critics. But they are often asked to paint a future picture of an increasing CO2 load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t think scientists will become art critics. But they are often asked to paint a future picture of an increasing CO2 load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny Burgoo</title>
		<link>http://www.collide-a-scape.com/2010/01/19/the-art-of-climate-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny Burgoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collide-a-scape.com/?p=2251#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>Why is it a fine line? Do you expect scientists to become art critics? Or are you thinking about them perhaps stepping in to correct any absurdly over-stated climate claims made by artists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it a fine line? Do you expect scientists to become art critics? Or are you thinking about them perhaps stepping in to correct any absurdly over-stated climate claims made by artists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.collide-a-scape.com @ 2012-02-10 17:48:55 -->
